-
Recent Posts
- Of Great Fears and Greater Hopes: The GPH-MILF Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro
- Some Quick Thoughts on Transnational Human Rights Litigation in American Courts After Kiobel
- Earlier Supreme Court Jurisprudence Shows Hope Not Lost for Those Seeking Corporate Accountability in U.S. Courts
- R.I.P. A.T.S.? How much of the Alien Tort Statute survives the Supreme Court’s Kiobel Decision?
- Fate of the Unilateral Option Clause Finally Decided in Russia
Recent Comments
- Eileen Simonsen on Territorial-based Income Taxation as International Ostracism
- Leah Trzcinski, Editor in Chief on NYU’s Journal of International Law and Politics Announces Inaugural Peer Reviewed Issue
- Ira Zuckerman on NYU’s Journal of International Law and Politics Announces Inaugural Peer Reviewed Issue
- The European Debt Crisis, continued . . . « JILP Forum on Implications of European De-Integration for International Law
- Lewis Wins Cohen Prize for Article on Exclusionary Rule « JILP Forum on Announcing Jerome A. Cohen Prize in International Law & East Asia
Categories
June 2013 M T W T F S S « May 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Meta
Territorial-based Income Taxation as International Ostracism
Taxes not only serve to raise public revenues but also to shape the behavior of taxpayers, and thus of the economy as a whole. The tax neutrality of Adam Smith is, therefore, the most hypocritical aspiration of any tax policy. … Continue reading →