skip to Main Content

ICJ Rules on Kosovo Independence

The International Court of Justice today held that international law did not prohibit Kosovo’s declaration of independence, while sidestepping the larger issue of Kosovo’s statehood.  All of the opinions can be found here, but we are happy to host the opinion of the court on this JILP Forum, since the ICJ’s site has been difficult to access as of late.

In a way, as Chris Borgen notes at Opinio Juris, this result should not come as a surprise, since international law generally does not seem to have much to say about declarations of independence.  The Court sidesteps the trickier problem of the lex specialis created by S.C. Res. 1244 (and the subsequent Constitutional Framework adopted by UNMIK) by holding that the declaration did not constitute an act of one of the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government.  This lays the groundwork for the Court to conclude that the declaration essentially took place outside the scope of S.C. Res. 1244 and the framework.  Preliminary thoughts after the jump.

I still want to read the separate opinions, etc., before writing any detailed comment, but I have a few initial thoughts.  First, the New York Times lede refers to legal experts, and warns that this ruling “could spur separatist movements around the world.”  This may be a bit too much spin.  If, as many seem to think, international law has largely been silent on declarations of independence, then this ruling likely reinforces the status quo, and a contrary decision would have stifled separatist movements to some degree.  The Court arguably affords no privilege to secession in this opinion, and the ruling on 1244, which was perhaps a much tougher (or more suspect) call, can be said to be combined to these facts.

But those are first thoughts, and reading the opinion provides germs for many more.  Judge Simma, for example, turns in a brief and engaging attack on the Lotus principle (roughly, that which is not prohibited is permitted), and Judge Cancado Trindade has published a 75-page concurring opinion that will be nice weekend reading.  Further questions:

(1) What are the consequences of the Court’s ruling that the principle of territorial integrity did not apply in this case? If territorial integrity is “confined to the sphere of relations between states,” (para 80) then could recognizing and establishing diplomatic relations with Kosovo theoretically still be wrongful within the framework of this opinion?

(2) Is this the first time that the Court has stated that subsequent practice of UN organs and affected States is relevant in interpreting Security Council resolutions? (Para. 94).  How would this work? I don’t think it can be justified by the same principles that support the use of subsequent practice in treaty interpretation.  (see VCLT art. 31).

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Εγγραφ
8 months ago

I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.

Mag-sign up sa Binance
3 months ago

Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you. https://www.binance.com/join?ref=P9L9FQKY

Frendy Ace
Frendy Ace
2 months ago

The ICJ Rules on Kosovo Independence highlights the complexities of international law and state sovereignty, acknowledging Kosovo’s declaration of independence while underscoring differing global perspectives. Similarly, the red one movie jackets represent bold fashion choices that stand out and make statements. Both embody themes of independence and identity in their respective arenas.

jeniffer
jeniffer
1 month ago

The ICJ ruling on Kosovo’s independence affirmed that Kosovo’s declaration of independence did not violate international law, paving the way for its recognition. Just as legal frameworks adapt to new realities, fashion, like the timeless <a href=”https://leathericonic.com/womens-brown-biker-leather-jackets/”>womens brown biker jacket</a> also evolves to reflect bold choices and individuality in society.

Andrew Son
Andrew Son
1 month ago

The ruling by the International Court of Justice on Kosovo’s independence marked a significant moment in international law, clarifying the complexities of state sovereignty and recognition. Just like how the ICJ decision provides a clear framework for understanding sovereignty, finding the https://goldenvape.co.uk/ offers clarity and reliability in a market full of options. Whether you’re exploring new vape products or seeking the best deals, a trustworthy online store can guide you towards quality choices, much like how legal precedents help us navigate complex global issues. It’s important to find a reliable source that suits your needs, whether in law or in leisure.

skapa binance-konto
29 days ago

I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.

binance Norādījuma bonusa kods

Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?

Back To Top
Search